Emptiness
Forever: Le Départ (1967) |
|||
|
With Le Départ, Jerzy Skolimowski moved
out of Poland for the first time; he filmed it in Belgium, with an added
complication that he didn’t understand any French. (His answer to a question
about the transition is instructive: he finds the problem of putting the camera
in the right place before shooting so difficult, that it does not matter to him
at all whether the filming takes place in Poland, Belgium or Hollywood.)
Skolimowski, not surprisingly, does not have as much to say about Belgium as
Poland. He may look at the city of Brussels with a fresh eye: the architecture
of roadways; the gleaming opulence of the motor show; the ritualistic
presentation of the female form at a swimsuit display; but these reveal little
more than his fascination (as an East European) with their appearance.
Nevertheless,
if Le Départ seems lightweight
Skolimowski, it is nonetheless his film. The hero, Marc (Jean-Pierre Léaud), is
in the tradition of the Skolimowski heroes: a young hairdresser who dreams of
becoming a famous rally car driver. He also seems to have a far greater
likelihood of achieving his dream than the student in Barrier (1966); whereas the latter does no more than look
covetously at the cars of the rich, Marc is constantly finding ways and means
of getting to drive them (communist subservience versus capitalist
opportunism?). His problem is to obtain a Porsche (and not a 912 but a 911S)
for a rally at the weekend; his journey derives from his single-minded pursuit
of this end. Le Départ is, however,
much funnier than Skolimowski’s previous films. If the student’s journey seemed
dream-like, Marc’s is simply bizarre, encompassing a con-trick, which involves
a friend dressed as a Mahrajah, to obtain a car; a sausage vendor who pokes a
sample of his wares up a Porsche’s exhaust (and later says to the hero: “You
want a sausage? Then blow up my tires!”); a pursuit of the heroine in which the
hero lies in front of the tram she is on; concealment of hero and heroine in
the boot of a car; seduction of the hero as he drives a car by its middle-aged
lady owner; and a car theft which has to be abandoned because a dog turns up in
the back seat.
As
for the heroine, Michèle (Catherine Duport), she has the slightly ‘older and
wiser’ demeanour of the Skolimowski heroine; she joins the hero on his journey,
but remains cool as he builds up to frenzy. And ultimately, like the girl in Barrier, she comes to awaken the hero
from the single-mindedness of his course. It should perhaps be mentioned that
Skolimowski chose these two players after seeing Jean-Luc Godard’s 1965 film Masculin-Féminin (he also took Willy
Kurant as cameraman). The choice I find quite subtle, since, although Godard
permutated his five protagonists in Masculin-Féminin fairly comprehensively, he did not develop the one potentially fruitful relationship: between Paul (Léaud) and
Catherine (Duport). Accordingly Le Départ is, in part, Skolimowski’s development of this relationship; he has expanded
the characterisations from Godard’s film, but not drastically altered them as
actor-portrayals. Masculin-Féminin was our first glimpse of Léaud’s ‘adult’ screen persona; Skolimowski has simply
brought this out to the full: Marc is the definitive Léaud role – quick,
energetic, humorous, histrionic, and as aggressive in conflict as he is
sensitive and shy with the heroine. And Skolimowski uses Catherine Duport’s
rather upper-bourgeois coolness to counterpoint Léaud’s histrionics, much as
did Godard, except that Skolimowski does allow her to come alive as well. One
cannot imagine Godard giving a daughter of the bourgeoisie such a choice
opening line as Michèle’s here when, in reply to Marc’s question about the
possibility of a dog having rabies, she says (with reference to her employer)
‘Not unless Madame van der Put bit him’.
Over
the pre-credit sequence to Le Départ (which shows Marc hurrying to the garage where his boss’ Porsche is kept),
there is a song which for the first time makes explicit the solitude of the
Skolimowski hero: ‘Emptiness forever, around us, despite us’. The song (and its theme) do in fact recur throughout the movie
in the manner of a love-theme; but it is a melancholy love-theme, underlining
the continuing loneliness rather than expressing ‘togetherness’. It is used
most beautifully in the sequence in the deserted motor showroom, when Marc and
Michèle sit in the two halves of a divided car which is rotating slowly on a
turntable: as the car turns, we watch the halves separate, dividing the couple,
which both visualises the emptiness expressed in the words of the song and
links this emptiness to the hero’s obsession with cars. In fact, the obsession
tends more to a fixation. Without being too psychoanalytical about it, one senses that Marc has always tried to fill the emptiness with
action (he is hardly ever still; even whilst waiting for a lift he bounds
around the banisters) and that driving fast cars became the logical culmination
of this, enabling him to achieve the greatest sublimation of his energies. Certainly
the sequences where he spins, whirls and skids his car around the streets of
Brussels are amongst the most lyrical in the film. However he has reached a
point where everything is subordinated to his need to drive; and although one
has every sympathy with the liberties he makes with
his employment (which must be frustrating his energies in the extreme) he is
scarcely any more considerate with Michèle. He dates here simply in order to
have an accomplice cum alibi when he goes to the motor show to steal spare
parts (in order that he can sell these and hire a car). However, before he can
do this he and Michèle have to hide out in the boot of a car, and it is here
that we witness their first gestures of communication with each other.
Excerpted from an
essay on Skolimowski published in Ian Cameron (ed.), Second Wave (London: Studio Vista, 1970). Reprinted with permission of the
author.
|
© Michael Walker 1970. |
|||